I am sharing the following exchange by text upon the request of the other party involved. This is someone I became acquainted with on education issues and over the past year around how their state fits into the topics I research. I did a livestream following this exchange, relating aspects of my experience to recent findings from Michael Levin’s lab around group information fields and communication blocking.
If you’re not sure what human weather is and how linguistic concepts manipulate it, check out this short link:
If you’d like to check out the clips from the Levin lab on embryology and information fields I have a playlist of clips here. Each one is super important.
Now in case you haven’t been following me for awhile, and you imagine I am excited about the prospect of using electrically engineered trachea cells to build swishy buildings in outer space, I’m not. In fact, I don’t support any of the work coming out of Levin’s lab or other biotechnology labs. My position at this time is that I seek to understand the concepts that are shaping the world around us, and the future, and demand that we have open, candid public conversations about the ethics of all of these things and how we should or should not proceed. Fair enough?
I don’t think I have to spend paragraphs or many minutes dramatizing my anger / fear / frustration over where we have landed as a culture. As far as I’m concerned, for me at least, that is a waste of valuable time. That said, if you feel directing your energy to that end is helpful, but all means don’t let me stop you. You do you, and I will do me, and if you are not into me or the insights I offer by all means move along to some other content creator. There’s something for everyone out there.
Below is a stream I did this week reflecting on our fraught exchange. At the time, I chose not to share the person’s name or the contents of our private exchange, because that wouldn’t have been proper. However, this person seems to believe that I misrepresented the conversation and requested I share the text exchange. So, in the spirit of openness I am honoring that request. Cheers to human weather, but I could use a little less turbulence.
These were two comments left on my livestream. I want to point out that I do not expect this person will share my perspective.
That said, I was also within my rights to remove myself from that emotional, energetic whirlwind. The commentary was very personally directed at me, and it was unkind.
My inclination, having researched the mechanics of the system, is that the words above are an example of how our inner worlds can be shaped by collective thought forms, Levin’s information fields. This is not to discount in any way the trauma we have all been through, the profound losses in all their myriad permutations. It is my opinion, that for me, staying in a negative energy state only serves the system’s goals. Therefore I am choosing for myself to continue with my research in a calm, level-headed way. If there are people out there who want to imagine that by stepping back from the outrage machine I am somehow agreeing to the plan, there’s nothing I can do about that. I am not about to transform myself to fit someone else’s idea of who they think I should be or what I should be doing. I will work hard not to try and force others to be who I might imagine they should be. Fair is fair.
We each have our own ways of being in the world. May we work towards fulfillment in ways that do not drag other people down. I have done that in the past myself. I recognize it, and I am trying to do better. We are all human. We are all learning. We all stumble. We all have grace.
Human weather can get ugly. Let us enjoy the clear, calm days when we have them.
In the exchange below, my comments are on the blue background. The other person’s comments are on the light gray background.
The Substack shared above can be read here.
I will pause here and note I have NEVER said “some new medical paradigm will be better than the old.” NEVER. This is attributing opinions to me that are not mine, but something imagined in the head of the person texting. This is human weather.
It was a check-in when I was discussing piezoelectricity and radium and the Curies’ ties to the Society for Psychical Research.
Ok, so the above statement to me implied that the work I am doing is a luxury – “quite a few people don’t have the luxury to worry about metaphysical research.” In my mind I do this work knowing that people in precarity are likely unable to do it and that since I am able, I have a responsibility to do it and put the conversation out into the public sphere for discussion.
Be careful. Corresponding via emails and texts to sort out differences is fraught with easily misunderstood words and intentions. A real conversation in person is a much better way to communicate, involving body language, nuance, true intention and the human spirit of shared humanity and grace. I know this in my life, sadly. Never resolved, because the other party was not interested.
To my way of thinking this is human weather. It was not meant as a conversation. That is what we are navigating now.
Fair enough 😊 I wish you well 💛
They say in Nantucket that if you don’t like the weather…wait five minutes.
I hear downtown Wyoming struggles with ‘five o’clock rush minute’.
I hear people in LA Calif tell you how many hours away you are rather than saying it’s just a few miles north on the 405.
I think about these random statements I’ve picked up along the way in this journey called my life. I do not know how many people have had the pleasure of trying to travel on the 405 parking lot ever in their life but it gives the driver a real spectrum of emotions, to the extreme where contemplating murder seems almost welcoming. But seriously I have never understood why people literally lose their minds in traffic. Like, I get it, this is not fun. No one wanted to just piss away their day in this miserable clusterf*ck. Sure it is very frustrating to think that EVERY friggin road is FULL, really, are you sure, did you check. It bends logic and reality inside peoples heads and you can watch them come unglued. So on the one hand, there you are observing everything while the person next to you has suddenly been possessed or something close to radically unrecognisable. What is the point? Now they scream bloody murder at their windshield as though the person driving in front of them are purposely holding up the only lane available. Screaming and flailing your limbs about does one thing- it causes more harm to the person screaming. The traffic still does not move. The car in front does not magically disappear. The person next to you observing all this is not the evil incarnate you are now labelling because they are not screaming like a mid exorcist dream like you. Just why? You KNOW you are going to be stuck in traffic. There is NOTHING you can do to change that, we’ll fly or get a motorcycle. So why scream, why go berserk? Does it satisfy something inside of you that you have put up this incredible display of distain. Are you satisfied that you have expressed to everyone else around that BRAVO another lost mind in the traffic doom from hell. Bravo. Eventually we arrive to our destinations. Eventually that person who screamed will feel exhausted, beat down and spent, to the point that now at the destination they are no longer capable of smelling the salty air, the faint coconut bodies, the smoky fire pits inviting you over for a conversation. They are already spent. Now they want everyone else to know how miserable they are. It’s not that the rest of us do not feel your pain, nor get how or why it got under your skin. We ALL got here by car so we ALL came here in our struggle as well. Now instead of being in the live moment of the living time and space one person is STILL screaming and crying and suffering to anyone who will listen, replaying over and over and over, like they are still stuck in their 405 parking lot hell. The sun has set- for the sun waits for NO ONES approval to set or rise on its schedule. Other people have looked forward to this point for ages and want to fully be present. Why wasn’t that person destroyed by the facts of traffic? Are they insensitive? Are they human? Sometimes the facts are just the facts. Emotional outbursts because you think something is so wrong does and proves nothing. It changes nothing to improve it for the next guy. It only tolls yourself. It stints your ability to function. However, this is a personal choice. Act/react. No one told you to be a d*ck, you chose to be one. Some people choose to be funny to a fault. I am not that person either. I am me, you are you, we are ALL different. We all make different choices and we all live different life paths. Sometimes we think we need to be in someone’s group but it’s a choice. No one is forcing you to join-follow-like-subscribe-comment… The machine does. The group leader maybe. Maybe not. When you’re attaching physical emotion to another persons post, ask yourself why? Why is this outraging you? Is it suppose to outrage you? Watch kittens, are you outraged? Think about it. Why scream at Alison for not coming unglued at the nonstop devastating horrors of life screaming towards us like a comet sure to be the coup-de-tah or however you spell that, to our very existence. If you feel she has not carried her own devastation of the last four years than you are seriously so far up your own *as to be of any use for anybody, let alone yourself. Since Alison has too much cough to say it, I will, in language that maybe is more comprehensive, get over it. Leave it at the door. Get a therapist. Meditate. Alison is not the worlds rehabilitation counselling and relief centre. She has carved out a public space for people to have a safe space to converse with others who are ASKING QUESTIONS to navigate their OWN grid vantage point. There is no proverbial tip hat to pay her for this ‘luxury’ of being the worlds whipping post. So, don’t be that d*ck that ruins it for the many. Alison has enough sh*t on her plate, she doesn’t want yours. Sorry, NOT sorry. Find a community that likes to focus on what you’re feeling. Point to where the internet hurt you. Get your badge, display your sticker, get that validation you so desperately seek. Go on, go. Surly THEY care about you. But if they do then it’s you. Just saying. If you don’t like what you see on the internet, this is going to sound f*cking crazy…but here goes… turn it off. YOU ARE WELCOME.
And the point is everyone gets to choose for themselves, but not for others. In this situation I feel I was made into an artefact to facilitate someone else’s process. It’s easier to project onto a target than self-reflect. Information field manipulation is the point I wanted to hit home on – not individuals. It seems very challenging to get that message across to people. I hope everyone takes time to watch some of the Levin clips. It matters. That said, it’s the choice of each person whether or not they want to know about it. I’ve made the information available.
Alison: I think your ability to get down in the weeds to hash out the details and uncover the big picture is your strength and Achille’s heel. I think it wise to reserve that ability and energy for the work you are doing over such exchanges. It’s rolling in the mud with someone who seems to care deeply, but has chose a path of anger and indignation that only fosters more of the same in the world. Not your onion. Wish them well and move on.
I am personally grateful for the work that you do. I find your writing to be insightful and often beautiful. you’re not on an easy path, but it is an honest and honorable one. Whenever you exit this world, you can say that even if your journey was messy and imperfect, you showed up. No small thing.
Might recommend carving out a little more time for joy and lighter dealings. You have a gift of perception and writing that can be used to inspire. God likes us to share what’s beautiful in the world too.
Really, my whole point was to be able to explain to people the idea of information fields and how they can be manipulated. It’s very easy to talk about people and emotion – people always have an opinion about someone else’s behaviors. I’d prefer to talk about ideas personally.
A huge control issue from Laura here. Lots of that going on these days.
So the point here is not about individuals. I am trying, maybe not successfully, to offer information that upon reflection we might have a new perspective to help any of us, myself included, when we are in a rough kind of emotional space. All of us have days when we are in a good place and days when we are not. What I was trying to convey was that we are navigating electrically charged spaces. Maybe some choose to amplify it. The feed definitely amplifies it. I am trying to practice leaning into a more neutral position, not always successfully. Humans connect with other humans we feel in sync with, and that can change over time. If there is a relationship that is not serving you well, you can quietly move on to greener pastures. That’s life. I am suggesting that when we are having strong emotional thoughts, it’s worth pausing to reflect on them. They may not be “your” thoughts, but an information field flowing through you. Cliff Gomes taught me that you can choose to let it pass and not get entangled in it. I found that to be a helpful tool for my toolbox. The goal for the stream was to show how Levin Lab’s research relates to manipulation of socio-technical systems. That should be the focus.
Human weather?
Humans are certainly weathered differently. It would be nice if we were more accepting of others’ storms. But, sometimes we are in a position of solid grounding and are therefor available to be another’s bellwether, sometimes that feels effortless, sometimes it feels like too much to ask. How we react when the weather is fine is often quite different than in stormy weather; we are not automatons. The first thing that closes down is often empathy. Caregivers suffer from ‘compassion fatigue’ in a similar way as soldiers from ‘battle fatigue’.
In this shift the first reaction moves from an internal dialogue that goes something like: “Oh, I can see she is really hurting right now, she needs a bit of acknowledgment from someone she sees as stronger, ok, I can give her a boast” ; to something more like, “Oh geez, again? These people are exhausting. Don’t they understand I’ve got my own personal shit to deal with, hardly need them piling on.” And it becomes quite evident in the tone, the lack of empathy, the solidarity that was not only sought in vain, but that got heartlessly dismissed, like a kick when you’re down.
Who is strong enough to walk through another’s storm with her? I think that’s why it’s a profession now.
You are not privy to other conversations on the topic of loss I have had with this person. Do you have thoughts on information fields or the other issues raised regarding the Levin Lab research? It does seem easy to react emotionally to situations rather than engage in new ideas. Maybe time for you to move on if you are looking for emotional comradery rather than information. I’m not here to be anyone’s therapist. If you concur with her presumption that anyone is entitled instruct another person on how to be in the world (outraged), this is not the place to come for information. We need not be all things to all people. I suggest you find greener pastures as well.
That was my point Alison, and your hostility is really unnecessary, doesn’t suit you, and doesn’t serve you.
Please move on. I’m not here for this purpose.
Hi Alison, I have been reading and following your research for a few years now. Human weather is a nightmare bound to happen I guess though humanity has been taken out of the equation and we are all data points ready to be mined. Technology has become down right scary. I have two children ages (m)13 and (f)11. They are phone-free which means they have no social media of their own. They do have data mined about them from the educational programs they use at the school such as i-Ready. They do have tablets which they use for recreation and sometimes school to log into i-Ready. My son has a school-issued Chromebook. I appreciate your work, thank.
I really appreciate you taking the time to consider the concepts I was presenting with regard to our relationships and where the children fit in. I’m having a challenging time navigating digital relationships with adults. I can’t imagine what this looks like combined with school yard bully behaviors and mean girl dynamics. People don’t even know this is something they need to be aware of. These devices have the capacity to generate their own energetic fields with the capacity to influence the psyches of users.
You are on it Alison, thank you. The resistance space is not a good place to be. Stick to being a calm observer, it is best and what I have learned from you. I have been there done that with the anger stuff.
Yes I live right next to Lake Cowichan and I found a nice piece of petrified wood the other day. My thought today was, if humans and all species have fascia body connections does the earth work in similar ways. Have a lovely day Alison!
See my comment below and the rest of the text exchange. May we all find and practice our humanity during these trying times that for many are not of their making. I am tired and exhausted from four years of being “strong” and helping others as best I can navigate their pain, Alison included.
Going forward, I will respect Alison’s wish to focus her energies elsewhere. I have never been one to be quick to leave a fallen comrade behind.
But as Alison accurately points out, we each have the right to proceed in this battle or these unusual times as we see fit.
I do not believe I was manipulated purposefully by some outside energy field intent on disrupting her research. I am clearly affected by the energy fields that are manifesting in real time and causing much trauma and harm due to the actions and inactions of those controlling the narrative or feed. If anything, I tried to explain how her characterization of what is happening often sounds as if she is invalidating the real life losses and experiences people are having, myself included.
I wish her well as she strives to understand their purpose and design. I feel I already know enough on that front to make a decision that I am not interested in having my life ripped apart so they can build or craft some version they think they can perfect through quantum computing.
Free will and individual sovereignty is IMO worth fighting for….many are raging against the current war on it and some, like Alison, are trying to make sense of it and have become oddly hopeful that it is not the assault on humanity that it appears to be.
But again, we each can still exercise our free will in choosing how we proceed in these uncertain and unprecedented times.
Thank you for acknowledging my struggle in remaining human in the midst of the pain and trauma.
My fight looks different than yours, but you can’t see me for who I am and what I am doing. I’m examining the quantum and for reasons you and I both know that is probably an area worth your attention. I am looking for better tools, because as far as I can tell the ones I used previously, and everyone else still seems to be using aren’t very effective.
There’s so much to know 💭
There really is. But I’m not going to tell anyone what they “should” know anymore. I’m just going to be over in my corner sharing what I find with people who find it interesting. Each person will find their own path.
Wow. Allison, thank you for this post, and I’m so sorry you went through this. I also am a bit…saddened? Surprised? Confused? I don’t know…I’m searching for a word, but I’m speaking of some of the other comments here. Anyway. I wish everyone well.
I came to send a virtual hug, which is rather a funny thing to say given the topics you discuss. I suppose I will clarify to: I wish I was there with you right now so that I could give you a wordless, but sincere, hug. Maybe we could have a cup of tea, and you could just vent, and I would zip it. Ha.
I watched your stream replay about this incident about a week ago, and seeing the exchange laid out here, I agree with your take. I already saw the linguistics clip from a talk you and Jason did, but I did take the time to watch all of the Levin clips. They are helpful; thank you.
My goal in this comment is simply to once again thank you for hanging in there in your work, and also, to offer my empathy and support.
Kindly,
Stephanie
I just want people to understand what may be in play with these energetic systems. Based on what I know of this person, it was inconsistent and unexpected. It could happen to any of us, but if we have the awareness maybe in the moment we can step back and ask – is this “thought” really me? Or something else? I don’t approve of the Levin Lab’s work, but at least they are open about it and we can talk about it.
I’m so sorry. Yes, it could happen to any of us. Actually, and sadly, it happened to me, multiple times. Awareness does help…I would say it is key, and your work helped me immensely in that respect.
You know, I was surprised at how open they were in the clips. They seem to be sincere and excited. I’m in an ethics class right now, and these topics would be a fascinating discussion there. More spreading of awareness.
The Chariot
There are three sciences in the study of man. The first is the Science of Ordinary Knowledge; the second is the Science of unusual inner states, often called ecstasy. The third, which is the important one is the Science of True Reality: of what lies beyond these two.
Only the real inner knowledge carries with it the knowledge of the Science of Reality. The other two are the reflections, in their own form, of the third. They are almost useless without it.
Picture a charioteer. He is seated in a vehicle, propelled by a horse, guided by himself. Intellect is the ‘vehicle’, the outward form within which we state where we think we are and what we have to do. The vehicle enables the horse and man to operate. The horse, which is the motive power, is the energy which is called ‘a state of emotion’ or other force. This is needed to propel the chariot. The man, in our illustration, is that which perceives, in a manner superior to the others, the purpose and possibilities of the situation, and who makes it possible for the chariot to move towards and to gain its objective.
One of the three, on its own, will be able to fulfil functions, true enough. But the combined function which we call the movement of the chariot cannot take place unless all three are connected in the Right Way.
Only the ‘man’, the real Self, knows the relationship of the three elements, and their need of one another.
There’s no sitting quietly in your ‘non-human weather’ weather, besides your Title has all your answers! Outrage -ously! Dear sweet Alison! You don’t get to play in your sandbox with others when they might have games of there own to share! From someone who’s sanity you help restore when things were going pear-shaped! You rock!
Graeme
I am trying to be more respectful that we each have our own journey to make and we don’t all have to approach it in the same way. When you are panicked you feel like you have to get everyone on the same page to DO SOMETHING. I am now reflecting on the possibility that there is far more than the “reality” that we can perceive with our five senses and that this material world isn’t all there is. It helps me be not so worried and try and take it one day at a time. I’m glad you got something out of my ramblings. It does make the bumps in the road a little less jarring.
See you getting to question things not academic is probably why you got the human weather to start with. I’m for what its worth a Truther/FreeDom tribe-ling and it struck me that everyone that’s not the narrative controllers, that are so pervasive, are Truthers/FreeDom tribe-lings too, on your group and its irrespective of how they, in true post modern fashion, identity.
I bet them bad un’s have you as high priority surveillance because your work actually illuminating areas they don’t expect to get much notice which turns out to be more important than presidential elections, poxy wars erupting in historically highly primed areas and fear porn disease X’s. You’ve always provided rigorous intellectual discourse to truther rank an file that isn’t a badly researched article or those uncensorable fantastic memes. Is this all data heaven for baby AI that’s triggering through digital scent-placing? Probably! However the sum of combined human consciousness is ever so slowly raised to meta sentience, maybe! You have a way of disagreeing with any and all about your work, so please accept the many evolving bastardisations, and may they go where they intended. If you familiar with Kalil Gibrain’s piece on children, I’d recommend you have a peek as it talks about children, like your ideas, not belonging to you, however your responsibility to launch correctly should be recognised!
My Dad died a month or so after yours, by listening to a TV celeb Doc pushing poisoned arrows, against my many protestations, so I believe I qualify to say grieving comes in all its glorious sizes, and your human weather person, Laura, honoured you by trying to connect about grief and tragically and completely missed the mark. It is my belief that people get what they want, even if it doesn’t seem so at the time and perhaps you gave it to her. It inspired this article did it not? As you made it quite clear, you weren’t in the space to be able to help. I would give it time and then invite her back! I seem to detect a deep affection for what you represent (which is never truly what you are), maybe even love. Being a reluctant guru is a bitch, right!
By the way, what’s it like being a ‘working girl’? I assume that what you do now!
Graeme
Hi Alison, I just mailed you as well, with a similar kind of scenario. I’ve also been feeling/realising it lately. “Reality ” is not what it seems at all. The reality where our 5 senses operate, the one we all experience, is being manipulated big time by some artificial mind. No human can pull of what is happening “here”. I think time and space, experiences, religions, history, narratives are all PROGRAMS and we are somehow being played, like Plato’s cave. It’s like The Truman Show combined with The Matrix movies. It’s like this ” fake” reality is superimposed onto the Real one, where we are our real Selves.
Hi Tina, I’m curious if you’ve watched the clips Alison posted on grammar fields as explained by Patrick Ryan? They’re in this post. I ask because the references to Plato’s cave, the Truman Show, and the Matrix are all used quite extensively in the alternative sphere… It would be an interesting experiment to have a blind sampling of those people’s content analyzed using this technique…
Hi Sofia, I haven’t watched all of them, this weekend I’m going to, I feel there is something there that will click. I’ve been on a mission For almost 2 decades, about 4 years ago I thought I knew quite a bit. Boy oh boy was I wrong lol
Yes, I also wonder if we ever had free will, don’t think so. Is it possible to get it? Clearing our own programming is one thing but we don’t know the game
Good morning Alison, I want to first thank you for posting this exchange, I think it was honorable for you to open yourself up to the scrutiny. I read the whole thing and comments several times, and kept saying to myself “what am I missing”? I have watched the full versions of the Michael Levin videos where your clips were pulled from, so I didn’t go back and re-watch those, however, I had NOT seen or heard of Patrick Ryan so yesterday I listened to several hours of his interviews. It was then that it started clicking for me. I came back onto your sight and re-read the exchange from a different vantage point; the grammar fields as explained by Ryan, and the manipulation of what Levin and his team are calling calcium responses… coupled with your presentations on both concepts, and it’s finally starting to coalesce into a coherent picture. You’ve been repeating yourself ad nauseam about the importance of watching the clips, and your patience is understandably being ground to a nub… People!! Please watch all the clips, or go to the originals and watch the whole interviews… It’s time to get critical in the evaluation of our own emotional responses as Alison has said many times. I have been doing this for a while, as I know our fields are being tampered with, but getting a handle on how this is being done, on a technological and scientific level brings it into a much clearer focus. Thank you for continually hitting us over the head with this stuff Alison, eventually it sinks in… Have a beautiful day xo
I very much appreciate you taking the time to sit with the ideas I was putting forward. There are so many concepts to try and get a handle on, and even when we do, it’s how they come together so that you have realizations about how we are experiencing what we understand as “reality.” I continue to make my way through Bentov’s “Stalking the Wild Pendulum,” it really feels that this is all about manipulation of vibrating crystals from within our biology to entire social structures. If we don’t understand the tools being used, we get blindsided. Often many times, because what happened doesn’t make sense. I hope the person in the text can set aside the personal sting and sit with the fact that the provocations in what felt to me like picking a fight (being that the other person knows exactly where I stand on things and that I’m not someone to be shifted by peer pressure) – that it wasn’t really her – the real her. It was some energetic field, perhaps a group field working through her. I would encourage you to go back and look at the Mateas clips about social gaming. From my vantage point is was exactly that.
I certainly will. Thank you. You’re right, a lot of the concepts on their own can make sense on an abstract and individual level, but when they finally start falling into a structure that the mind can make sense of, those are the hallelujah moments. I’ll have to check out Stalking the Wild Pendulum as well.
Here are the Mateas links and where he fits into my “environmental templating” maps. I shared this experience not to “win” in some personality game arena, but to point out how these dynamics play out in our lives – or at least that is how I see what happened, how it unfolded. Once you have the lens, you may not be able to stop it from happening but you then have the opportunity to pause and reflect on the situation with more context – whether the person being activated is yourself or someone you’re engaged with.
https://embed.kumu.io/22bb3029c810ad8a8915ac6da749697f#untitled-map?s=bm9kZS1YY1VlZ1hLeA%3D%3D
https://wrenchinthegears.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/mateas-map.png
It’s a bit of a riddle for me, listening to these links, and other full lectures he’s given over the years, on what exactly their intended ‘use case’ looks like… because it seems like such a feedback loop. They’re borrowing the research from Eric Berne, Erving Goffman, and Wilder Penfield who have ostensibly reduced human interaction to a finite set of social games, so what is the point? Prom Week is a single player game, so is the data gathered mainly for reinforcement learning purposes? Or are they hoping that with enough input, some new and novel psychological games(s) will emerge? I know it’s all about systems, and gaming the commons, but I wish I had the capacity to see what the broader scope of this type of research is going to yield that they don’t already have. Maybe it plays a role in the development of the dashboard templates? What prompts are needed to nudge the psyche into making the “right decision”? Nevertheless, it does bring the question of free will into the picture rather forcefully… did we ever have it? Has it always been within these narrow parameters? Really interesting stuff. I know these questions are elementary to you, I’m just pondering out loud. One thing though, you’re so right, once you see this type of social gaming put like this, the last thing you want to do is participate!
I think it has to do with “wisdom of the crowd” and “consensys” – mixed with Web3. A friend shared this article on making an origami computer, which for me the “true/false” logic gates are smart contracts. They mention that other things like “Magic The Gathering” card games could also be restructured as a computer. I think this is a lot like D&D – roleplaying gives access to the psyche and the field. I think it may also relate to accessing superposition realities that are structured like lattice crystals. I have been doing a lot of work on quantum psychiatry and lipids the past week. It’s liquid crystal. This guy Frederic Seitz is quite interesting. I wonder if you unfold an orgiami sheet you get a 2-D of 3-D reality that is not unlike crystal nodes. Maybe the game is navigating hypercubes? https://www.quantamagazine.org/how-to-build-an-origami-computer-20240130/
Stephers just shared this clip with me – it may be part of it.
Loren Carpenter was at Boeing working on Fractals and later Schaefer was.
I think definitely this is it. https://wrenchinthegears.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/02/schaefer.png
https://embed.kumu.io/d70f60f8c5ff46033a8079d5f237d3d8#untitled-map?s=bm9kZS1ERjVqaWh1aQ%3D%3D
https://wrenchinthegears.com/wp-content/uploads/2024/01/Fractals-and-Complex-Systems-Paolo-Grigolini-University-of-North-Texas.pdf
We need to be stepping away from this framing IMO “What prompts are needed to nudge the psyche into making the “right decision”? ” That outlook is grounded in the authoritarian framework advanced by the resistance movement, and it is not the game as I see it. As I see it, the game is emergence within complexity – yes there are the parameters of the game board, but the goal is to drive collective human behavior to generate novel information for the system. Again, I am NOT saying this is a good thing, but is a FUNDAMENTAL difference I have with almost all of what has branded itself as “the resistance.” Those people are unwilling to consider they don’t actually understand the game and in their obliviousness and hubris that they know it all, they are contributing to the anxiety and fear of its members and enacting its own form of trauma-based mind control.
I think that sums it up quite well. While listening to the ‘resistance’ I am starting to notice their blatant contradictions. My favourite (and I am being facetious) is ‘we are winning!’ … winning what exactly? They never explain what exactly we are winning. Then the doom and gloom follows, but before you can digest that, we are winning. No. No we are not. And I am fully convinced either they have no clue what they think they are winning, or they are where they are meant to be as useful idiots in the ‘lock their attention in’ space. I am trying my darnedest to wrap my head around all of this, not just to have a clear path in my own head, but because I have children and best of all, a grandchild. My pain is that my grandchild is in another country and by default is in the military. The over-reach of technology and the monitoring and surveillance and feedback loops is gut wrenching. Until I can grasp it, I cannot make a conversation for it, so yes, the struggle is real, but I stay calm and do my best to understand and learn this information everyone shares here. At least here I can walk away with some sense of feeling ground, and for that I am grateful!
Alison…
Don’t pick and choose what to share of the text. You left out out the last part of our messaging.
And don’t say you didn’t see it because you had “blocked me” and so you never got it….because you referenced it in your talk about the “weather event” as you call it.
For those who care to see the rest of the exchange. My final text was as follows:
“Oh Alison, of course your losses count. They count very much. That is kind of my point….don’t deny your own anger, hurt, and don’t make excuses for those who caused it.
I’m sorry you feel the need to block me. I care about you. I simply wanted you to recognize that you need to realize that people are desperate for explanations relative to the pain they are experiencing and the losses should not be ignored. And honestly, those doing this to us want us tearing at each other instead of finding our common humanity.
I wish you well. Was not trying to be mean spirited.
People are trying to make sense of what does not add up in their actual lives in real time…and it is not their fault and they are not simple minded. They just can’t fathom that anyone would commit this kind of evil….especially in the supposed name of saving mankind.
You do not need more losses in your life and I apologize if you think I was minimizing that…not at all. I would never…I have been up to my eyeballs in helping others through their sudden and ugly losses these days. I would not wish that on anyone,
I do know people who stopped following you because they felt you minimized their losses and said it did not count because it is all just part of some narrative whereby people are being manipulated. I know that was never your intent…so I was trying to explain to you how sometimes that is the message from your intense focus of not getting caught up in the narratives out there,
I wish you well, I really do. “
If you were a true friend you would have had the humanity to reply when I reached out to you by phone and email. I have gotten used to it. You’re one more hashmark of diverged paths. Your provocations were unkind. It was a fight you picked for whatever reason, and to me it seems you used me as a target for your anger on that day. I was giving you the benefit of the doubt that it wasn’t the “real” you I thought I’d come to know. But if it was, maybe consider what it was inside yourself that led you to feel that it was your place to treat me like you did – to “fix” me to be a proper resistance participant with the “right” and “appropriate” emotions to be displayed for public view and consumption. Is there a leaderboard somewhere and I was falling behind on the grounded in “reality” dashboard? Do I really look like I care if I lose audience members? Really? If I do, my journey is not for them and they will flit off somewhere else to find what they need I’m sure. It happens. We are all human. I hope you learned something. For me, I continue to learn the lesson of not trusting online people even if they seem very nice for awhile.
PS: I blocked you on my youtube channel, because when I saw the notifications of eight comments and read the first two that were incredibly spiteful and it seems factually inaccurate about the use of the ideas of my research as a “metaphysical luxury,” I shut it down and didn’t read the rest. I am protective of my energetic space. Maybe stuff like that plays on the free for all that is Substack, but not in my space. Again, I’m not here for the masses. That’s not what this is about.
I have no pretensions to Alison, I have no desire to see her joined in any movements, nor to change anything in her field and style of research. I thank her very much for her hard work on her precise research, which we have almost nowhere else to see and which open doors to fundamental realities for the understanding of the grand scheme.
Without any doubt, in my opinion, a full understanding of her thorough researchs is a luxury, who not everyone can afford. These are very serious entries into layers of reality that very little is said in such depth. So it can’t cost cheap to understand them. It’s expensive, sometimes I can’t afford it.
But, if hypothetically, Alison compromised, reducing her work to a widespread level of understanding that operates within a relatively clear and limited cognitive-emotional framework, what would happen? Strictly speaking, isn’t the essence of her research precisely in breaking away from that usual cognitive level to which some believe she should integrate? Not intentional detachment, but simply the results of precise dissection, show the parasitic essence of the mass narrative.
It is pointless “to dilute wine with water”; however, the opposite is always meaningful, although difficult to achieve.
*I still don’t know what the “freedom movement” is, but I am brief contact with some of the more “reliable” alternative authors and, for me, no doubt that they, intentionally or not, are involved in a distortion and cover-up operation. They don’t seem to want to go as far as unraveling the issues they are dealing with, but instead maintain a balance between disclosure and mystery that provides a continuation of the narratives (but also shapes the community of their followers who come back again and again for a new portion of half-disclosures). And it seems to be much more than directing the narrative and fabricating consent. Rather, it is the construction of the neural circuits of the invisible brain, which combines different, incompatible with each other, bee colonies.
I mean, not just I guess. I certainly know this in relation to something important about the problems they are dealing with, which they (those I contacted) are unwilling to say; I know because I told them, but they’re silent. But that’s another topic.
Greetings, Alison. 🙂
Thank you for seeing me. We don’t all have to be the same. I am trying to be my most authentic self, but I am over here in my corner doing my thing. I’m no longer shouting at people to pay attention. I have no more right to claim space in their consciousness than they do in mine. For those who are attuned to the same frequency, we will find the common problem space. No judgement on those who choose other rooms.